Failing to assess the correct timing when considering disability status can be costly for employers.
In the recent case of All Answers Ltd v Mr W and Ms R  EWCA Civ 606, the Court of Appeal reaffirmed the importance of timing when determining disability status.
The court confirmed that the assessment of whether an impairment had lasted, or was likely to last at least 12 months, should be made at the date of the alleged discrimination.
The claimants, Mr W and Ms R, alleged that on 21st and 22nd August 2018 they were the subject of instances that gave rise to claims for disability discrimination. Both claimants asserted they satisfied the statutory definition of disability at the time of the acts.
The Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) found that both claimants were disabled, within the meaning of section 6 and schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010.
The respondent, All Answers Ltd, accepted that on 21st and 22nd August 2018, both claimants were suffering from mental impairments that had substantial adverse effects on their abilities to carry out day to day activities.
It appealed the tribunal decision in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (‘EAT’) and subsequently to the Court of Appeal.
All Answers Ltd contended that both the ET and the EAT had failed to consider if the impairment had a substantial and long-term adverse effect. That is an effect which, judged at the date of the alleged discriminatory acts, was likely to last for 12 months and, in the case of Ms R, wrongly took into account events occurring after that date.
The Court of Appeal considered that the key question in the case was whether or not, at the time of the alleged discriminatory acts, the effect of the impairment was likely to last at least 12 months.
It concluded that this question is, “to be assessed by reference to the facts and circumstances existing at the date of the alleged discriminatory acts”.
It also stated that “the tribunal is not entitled to have regard to events occurring after the date of the alleged discrimination to determine whether the effect did (or did not) last for 12 months”.
It upheld the earlier decision in McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College  EWCA Civ 4, which applied to the question of whether an impairment was likely to recur, and whether the impairment was likely to last at least 12 months.
The Court of Appeal concluded that the tribunal had failed to assess whether the effect of the claimants’ mental impairments, as assessed at 21st and 22nd August 2018, were likely to last for at least 12 months.
It held that the EAT was wrong to overlook this error.
This decision reiterates the importance of considering all the elements of the disability status test under s6 and schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010.
It is also essential to consider the question of whether an impairment had lasted or was likely to last at least 12 months at the date of the discriminatory acts.
Furthermore, it makes clear, when determining if an impairment is ‘long term’ for the purposes of assessing disability status, a tribunal cannot consider events after the date of the alleged discriminatory act.
If you are facing a claim regarding disability status, it is important to look at the date the alleged act took place in order to make an assessment of disability status.
If you need any advice on disability discrimination or any other employment-related matter, please contact our Employment team for an initial chat.Contact us
For help with a legal problem or more information on any of our services at Lodders, please get in touch with our friendly team. You can contact us via the number or email address below, or fill in the form and we will get back to you as quickly as we can.
Lodders’ top-ranking family law team has appointed family law expert…
June 22, 2022
Specialist commercial property development and investment solicitor Chris Dewes joins…
June 09, 2022
Cotswold Hunt is hoping to retain its crown as champions…
May 30, 2022
Lodders' partner and head of the Family team, Beverley Morris…
May 23, 2022
Lodders is in the running for the Law Firm of…
May 18, 2022